|
|
Size - Body structure - Structure - Type
Part 1
I still remember very well a judge from Norway, who lifted up the
cats to check their weight.
His colleagues and exhibitors smiled at him and made ironic jokes upon
him, like: Ah, he does not really see very well! Are cats now judged
according to their live weight? The heavier the higher the title?
All those satirists simply were thoughtless and seemed not to know
the standard of their own breed seriously!
Is weight in any way connected with body structure?
Can weight be an indicator for the quality of a cat?
Simple answer: Yes!
Let us take a look at the various standards (breed description) of
the different organizations.
But, let's compare that first with the dogs:
Teckel: FCI-Standard No 148
SIZE AND WEIGHT/ IMPORTANT MEASUREMENTS :
Dachshund : Circumference of chest 35 cm. Upper weight limit about 9
kg.
Miniature Dachshund : Circumference of chest from 30 to 35 cm measured
when at least 15 months old.
Rabbit Dachshund : Chest circumference up to 30 cm measured when at
least 15 months.
Weight : Standard Dachshund up to about 9 kg.
Deutscher Schäferhund: FCI-Standard No 166
SIZE/WEIGHT:
Dogs: height at withers 60 cm to 65 cm
Weight 30 kg up to 40 kg
Bitches: height at withers 55 cm to 60 cm
Weight: 22 kg up to 32 kg
Yorkshire Terrier: FCI-Standard No 86
WEIGHT : Weight up to 3,1 kg (7 lbs).
If one searches in the standards of cats for a similar description,
he will fail. There are no statements, how heavy the various cat
breeds shall be at least.
One has to ask the following questions:
 | Why do such descriptions exist in dogs, but in cats not?
One of the standard answers is: But dogs fulfill another function,
they are working dogs, guard dogs, hunting dogs, etc.
This answer is very superficial and is not really correct. Many dog
breeds are companion or so called toy dogs, their only use is to
accompany humans, as cats also do. |
 | Is it unimportant in cats to know, what their minimum weight
shall be?
One standard answer is: But cats are not judged according to their
weight, they are judged according to their entire appearance and
proportions.
Also this answer is very superficial and convenient. If one looks
for example at several breeds, like Abyssinian, Birman, Persian,
etc., one has to realize that these breeds have become smaller
significantly over the last years, and thus also have become
lighter. When a Persian male had 7-9 kilos 10 years ago, and
Persians had been a large breed, as it is written in the standard,
modern typed Persians have become significantly smaller, and a
Persian male has now 6-7 kilos (if it has so much). |
 | Is it obviously more difficult in cats to define such weight
ranges?
One has to raise the question, why it is possible in dogs to define
such weight ranges, and why it is not possible in cats.
It is a simple question to collect statistical data about the
various cat breeds over a certain period to define an average weight
or a minimum weight. But the cat world has its problems, when it
comes to statistics, one does not like to hear the word
'statistics'. Why and wherefore? |
 | It is also quite interesting that weighing tables are made in
kittens with an astonishing accuracy. And that has its well founded
reasons, as weight increase is an important indicator, if kittens
develop healthy.
But, in adult cats over sudden it is not so important to know about
their weight and to have minimum weights for them. |
Body structure, size and weight are connected to each other.
 | A firmer more solid bone structure means also more weight.
For example: Birmans shall have a solid bone structure. When looking
at many Birmans of today, they are too small and light built like a
feather. |
 | A fine delicate bone structure means less weight.
For example: Abyssinians shall be medium-sized cats. When looking at
the modern typed Abyssinians, the cats are rather small than
medium-sized, and significantly built finer than their standard
indicates. |
 | Large cats are usually heavier than small cats.
For example: British Shorthair shall be medium to large in size and
shall have a solid bone structure. When looking at several silver
tabby British Shorthair, they are not medium in size, they are quite
small and too light built. However, this colour variety wins
frequently in shows, because one is impressed by their attractive
and striking pattern and colour. |
 | One can draw some conclusions about the bone structure based on
the weight, if the structure corresponds to the standard.
But, that is not correct! A heavy cat might be 'fat' or 'thick'.
This article does not deal with overweight cats, which are fed to
death by their owners due to their misled love for animals and lack
of consequence.
For example: The Norwegian Forest Cat shall have a solid and strong
bone structure, as it corresponds to a 'Forest Cat'. However, cats
with a straight profile and a long wedge shaped head do win quite
frequently in shows, despite they are too small and too fine built,
even points are allotted to bone structure in the scale of points of
many organizations. |
 | Males shall be larger than females in almost all standards, and
thus also shall be heavier.
For example: Persian males of modern type look very often feminine,
and it is somewhat difficult to see a difference to females. Even in
several organizations the same amount of points is allotted to the
head and the body, the head will count more, if it has a domed
forehead, oversized eyes and an extremely short nose. It is
unimportant, if one has problems quite often to see a difference
between a male and a female. |

Which size do several cat breeds have?
When reading in the standards of the various organizations, one is
surprised that not for all breeds the size is stated, how large that
specific breed should be.
| Breed |
CFA |
TICA |
FIFe |
ACF |
WCF |
| Abyssinian |
medium in size |
The overall impression
of the ideal Abyssinian / Somali is a medium cat.
Does medium cat also mean medium in size, or does it mean
medium proportions? |
Body: medium built,
medium long There is no statement about the size. |
Body: Medium build
There is no statement about the size. |
medium in size |
| Bengal |
not recognized |
It is a medium to large
cat. |
General: Size: medium to
large |
CONFORMATION: It is
medium to large. |
a cat of medium to large
size |
| Birman |
no statement about
the size |
medium to large in
stature |
General: Size: medium in
size |
Body: Medium weight
There is no statement about the size. |
a cat of medium size |
| British Shorthair |
BODY: medium to large |
Boning: Substantial.
Large to medium. |
General: Size: large to
medium |
Body: Large to medium in
size |
a cat of medium to large
size |
| Burmese |
GENERAL: The overall
impression of the ideal Burmese would be a cat of medium size. |
The overall impression
of the ideal Burmese would be a cat of medium size. |
General: Size: medium |
Body of medium length
and size. |
The body is medium in
size and length. |
| Chartreux |
BODY: Females are
medium; males are large. |
BODY: Size in females
medium; males large. |
General: Size: medium to
large |
Body: Medium in size |
a cat of medium size |
| Cornish Rex |
Body: small to medium in
size |
BODY: Small to medium in
size |
General: Size: medium |
no statement about
the size |
an elegant cat of medium
size |
| Devon Rex |
no statement about
the size |
no statement about
the size |
General: Size: medium |
no statement about
the size |
The body is medium in
size and length. |
| Maine Coon |
BODY: Size medium to
large. |
The Maine Coon
is a large breed. |
General: Size: large |
Body: medium to large in
size |
a cat of large to very
large size |
| Manx |
Body: medium in size |
BODY: medium-sized body. |
General: Size: medium |
Body: medium in size |
a cat of medium size |
| Norwegian Forest Cat |
Body: Males should be
large and imposing; females may be more refined and may be
smaller.
How large are females now? |
A Norwegian Forest is
large to medium-large size. |
General: Size: large |
Size: large |
a cat of medium to large
size |
| Persian |
BODY: Large or medium in
size. |
Body: Medium to large in
size. |
General: Size: medium to
large |
Body: Large or medium in
size. |
a cat of large to medium
size |
| Russian (Blue) |
no statement about
the size |
no statement about
the size |
no statement about
the size |
no statement about
the size |
a slightly elongated cat
of medium size |
| Scottish Fold |
BODY: medium Does
medium also mean medium in size, or does it mean medium
proportions? |
The shorthair is medium
in size. And the longhair? |
not recognized |
Body: medium Does
medium also mean medium in size, or does it mean medium
proportions? |
a cat of medium to large
size |
| Siamese |
GENERAL: the ideal
Siamese is a medium sized cat. |
Body: Medium-sized. |
General: Size: medium |
Body: Medium in size |
an elegant cat of medium
size |
| Singapura |
GENERAL: small to medium
sized muscular bodied cat. |
Overall impression of
the ideal Singapura is a medium to small, compact cat. |
not recognized |
Body: Small to medium
overall size cat. |
a relatively small cat |
| Sphynx |
The Sphynx is of medium
size. |
Body: Medium in size |
General: Size: medium |
Body: Size: Medium. |
a cat of medium size |
| Turkish Angora |
Body: medium size |
Body: Medium-sized. |
General: Size: medium
size for females; males are slightly larger How large are males
now? |
not recognized |
a cat of medium size |
| Turkish Van |
no statement about
the size |
Torso: Size is large and
imposing in males, females proportionately less so. How large
are females now? |
no statement about
the size |
no statement about
the size |
a cat of medium to large
size |
These are only some breeds. But however, one can see already in
this table the following peculiarities:
 | In several breeds there is no statement about their size. They
may be small, medium in size, or large. |
 | Very often the size for the entire cat is not given, but only
for the body. |
 | In British Shorthair there seems to be no common sense, if it
shall be medium to large in size, or if shall be large to medium in
size. The sequence shows a certain preference, which size should be
preferred. |
 | In females sometimes no size is given, except that they are
smaller than males. Such a statement does not tell us anything about
the size! |
 | The Bengal shall be medium to large in size. Where are the large
Bengals in the shows? |
 | For the Turkish Angora, which is significantly finer built than
the Turkish Van, a size is given. In Turkish Van small,
medium-sized, and large cats have to be accepted, because the
majority of organizations does not give any statement about the
size. |
 | Also in Persians there seem to be no common sense. Shall they be
primarily large or medium in size? One may see that there is no
common sense about the size in the different sequencing of wording:
medium or large in size - here both options are left open, medium to
large in size, large to medium in size. |
 | Only the WCF is consequent and give a size for each breed. |

Terms used to describe the size
| Size |
Remarks |
| medium in size |
When comparing the
breeds of medium size with each other, the term "medium in size"
is very flexible. One has to raise some questions:
 | Is a Bengal larger than a Devon Rex? |
 | Is a British Shorthair larger than a Chartreux, as the
Chartreux is described as a cat of medium size? |
 | Are Burmese and British Shorthair of equal size, when both
are medium in size? |
 | Are Persians and Abyssinians of equal size, when both are
medium in size? |
 | Are Turkish Angora and Sphynx of equal size, when both are
medium in size? |
|
| large |
When comparing the large
breeds to each other, one has to raise the following questions:
 | Are Maine Coon and Norwegian Forest of equal size, when both
are large? |
 | Are Maine Coon and Persians of equal size, when both are
large? |
 | Are Maine Coon and Turkish Van of equal size, when they are
large? |
|
| medium to large in
size |
 | First in the sequence is the word 'medium', that could be
interpreted as minimal size. |
 | Or are these cats medium in size in general, and large cats
are also tolerated? |
 | Or is the sequence in wording without any meaning? But, why
does the reverse sequence of wording exist? |
|
| large to medium in
size |
 | First in the sequence is the word 'large'. Does it mean that
the cats shall be primarily large? |
 | Does this sequence in wording mean that also cats of medium
size are tolerated? |
 | Or is the sequence in wording without any meaning? But, why
does the reverse sequence of wording exist? |
|
| small |
Are there also small cat
breeds? Or are all breeds at least medium in size?
When looking at the breeds in the table above, one may notice 2
breeds, which may also be small:
Cornish Rex and Singapura.
 | Are Cornish Rex smaller than Devon Rex, when they are small? |
 | Are Cornish Rex and Singapura of equal size, when both are
small? |
 | Are Singapura smaller than Devon Rex, when they are medium
in size? |
|
| small to medium in
size |
 | Is medium in size here a different size than in medium to
large in size? |
 | Is medium in size here a different size than in large to
medium in size? |
 | Or is medium in size of the same size as in medium to large
in size and as in small to medium in size? |
|
There have to be raised many questions, if one looks at the
description of the size given for the various breeds.
Medium in size seems to be not the same as medium in size in
various cat breeds.
Referring to the standards of the dogs: One may get a clear picture
from the size, how large a specific dog breed shall be, because the
height at withers is given here.
And, why can this not be achieved also in cats?

Continued: Part 2 What is structure - build of body?

© katzenzeitung 6/2007 |
|
|